Compare the technical starting point
instead of guessing.

The Competitor module compares your URL with chosen domains using public technical signals — Insight module scores, visible UX elements and differences between sites. It is not spying or a market research guarantee: it shows where you lead and where rivals pull ahead technically.

Illustrative product view
71
Comparative score Sample analysis
Perf
+4
SEO
−3
A11y
+1
Insight lines up your site against competitors — before you commission market research or a strategy audit.

A single “competitor score” does not say how much traffic a rival has or what their strategy is. The module combines public technical signals, module results and visible UX differences in one report — with no promises of revenue, traffic or surveillance data.

From scan to an advantage map.

Four steps from your URL and rival list to a decision — without guessing whether the gap is performance, SEO, accessibility or visible page elements.

Modules Scan

Performance, SEO, Accessibility, Security and Ecology results side by side.

PerfSEOA11y
Gaps

Spots where rivals pull ahead technically — LCP, meta, headings, security.

LCPMetaSec
Advantages

Areas where you beat the competitor average — accessibility, ecology, UX.

A11yEcoUX

Pick domains

You provide your address and up to three competitors. The module scans publicly available pages — no panel logins or internal data access.

Comparison · modules
Performance +4
vs avg
SEO −3
vs avg
Accessibility +1
vs avg
Scan · public signals

Module comparison

Performance, SEO, Accessibility, Security and Ecology results side by side. You see deltas vs rival averages and which module sets you apart.

Gaps vs rivals
6

Gaps and advantages

Findings are ordered by impact on your position vs competitors. You know whether to start with LCP, metadata, accessibility or visible UX signals.

71
+6
65 before
71 after

Track changes

After optimization you return to previous comparisons. You check whether you caught up in a chosen module — with no full market research promise.

Score comparison

The verdict: winning or losing — and where.

Four quality modules set against your competitors: overall score, a winner per metric and an unambiguous verdict. Instead of "theirs looks nicer" you get numbers for the client conversation.

  • Overall verdict: winning / losing / tie
  • A winner per metric, not just an average
  • The same methodology for both sides
WINNING OVERALL · 78 vs 74
You Rival A
Performance 82 vs 64
SEO 78 vs 81
Accessibility 81 vs 69
Security 58 vs 66

Benchmark trend

Your distance to competitors over time.

A single benchmark is a photo — the trend is the film. Every scan adds a point: you see whether shipped fixes close the gap to rivals or the distance grows.

  • Score change vs the previous benchmark
  • Scan history on one axis
  • Proof of progress for the client report
5 scans · change vs previous benchmark: +4
#1#2#3#4#5

Intelligence modules

On-demand: stack, content pace, gaps.

A rival stack teardown, publishing pace, site structure and content gaps — run on demand, each for separate credits. You pay for what the offer actually needs.

  • Tech stack spy: CMS, frameworks, stack costs
  • Content velocity: rival publishing pace
  • Structure and content gap: what you are missing
Tech stack spy CMS, frameworks, stack costs
2 cr Run
Content velocity Rival publishing pace
2 cr Run
Structure gap Site structure vs the rival
2 cr Run
Content gap Rival phrases without your page
2 cr Run

AI citability

Who gets cited by AI — you or the rival.

A brand-citation heuristic measures how homepages score on patterns AI engines reward: Q&A structure, authority, freshness. It is a heuristic result — it does not replace a full GEO audit.

  • You vs competitors on one scale
  • Patterns: Q&A · structure · authority · freshness
  • Honestly: a heuristic, not a full GEO audit
Brand-citation heuristic · homepages · does not replace a full GEO audit
Your domain 71
Rival A 64
Rival B 58
Q&AStructureAuthorityFreshness
For agencies and freelancers

Built for working on client sites.

  • Market context for the client conversation
  • Rival gaps as an argument in your offer
  • A benchmark ready for the report

Instead of more separate scanners
one audit and a clear order of action.

One scan shows what is worth fixing. No card, no commitment — results in about 2 minutes.

No credit card Report with date and sources No account required