A shared quality backlog, owners, statuses and change history help the team check what needs action before and after a release.
The Free plan covers one project. No card required.
Web team pain points
Typical problems of organizations running several sites with a shared backlog — and how the shared view looks in Insight.
The main site, campaign landings, documentation and product subdomains land in one account with separate measurement history.
Audit findings become tasks with an owner and a priority — instead of being passed back and forth between QA and developers.
Instead of random results between projects, the team sees which pages need attention and which metrics to fix first.
Instead of collecting results from many tools, the team gets one shared view of analysis scope, changes and post-deployment priorities.
Insight modules
All of the organization’s domains go into one account, and each quality area has its module on the same scale.
LCP, INP and CLS across the mobile purchase path — from homepage to checkout.
Core Web Vitals for all sites in one place — with measurement history after every release.
View moduleThree situations where a shared quality view helps set priorities faster and avoid regressions.
Check staging and compare it with production. Catch CWV, SEO or accessibility drops before the change reaches users.
Every release is visible in the project history. You see which metrics dropped and who is responsible for the fix.
Instead of ten screenshots from different tools, you hand over one report with trends, priorities and progress.
Process
Insight walks you through the audit step by step — without stitching results from several tools or bringing in an external auditor.
Main site, landings, documentation, subdomains — each URL is a separate project with its own history.
Insight checks performance, SEO, accessibility, security and ecology for every project.
Findings are sorted by impact and urgency — one list instead of three opinions.
After fixes, run another analysis and verify whether the score actually improved.
Analyzing…
After the audit
A concrete issue list for developers, designers, marketing and leadership — with priorities, not a raw data dump.
See Insight modulesA shared quality view for every domain and project in the organization.
A regression list to check before the next deployment.
Tasks assigned to specific people with due dates and priorities.
Ordered priorities to discuss at sprint planning.
Measurement history and proof of improvement after deployments.
A quick indication of which pages need attention first.
It depends on the plan. The Scale plan covers multiple domains and projects in one account, so the main site, landings and subdomains each get a project with its own measurement history. Limit details are on the pricing page.
Every measurement is saved in the project history, so a score drop after a release is visible when comparing analyses. The Monitoring module can additionally watch availability and key metrics between full audits.
Yes. Team plans allow working on projects together: audit findings can be turned into tasks, assigned, and tracked in one place.
No. Insight is not an APM tool — it analyzes site quality from the user’s and search engines’ perspective: performance, SEO, accessibility, configuration security and ecology. It complements infrastructure monitoring rather than replacing it.
The Accessibility module detects automatically measurable WCAG issues and flags areas for manual review across all of the organization’s sites. It is a starting point for a compliance plan — a full EAA assessment also requires manual testing.
Connect domains, projects and departments into one quality view — and start improving what matters together.
