Skip to main content

SEO audit & report

WooRank alternatives, tested on two real sites

We tested seven free versions on two sites with known defects.

Tests from 29 September and 1 October 2026Method and raw results

Two starting points
Insight

Quality audit

Findings, tasks and a retest

WooRank

SEO report

A specialist scope and workflow

Use-case illustration. Detailed scope below.

Tests from 29 September and 1 October 2026

What each free check found

Known defects each tool reported in its free version. WooRank is missing: its free preview shows 2 of 79 checks.

What each free check found
CometWeb InsightSO SEOptimerSB Seobility
danluu.comBare engineering blog with obvious problems 9 defects
No <title>FoundFoundFound
No H1FoundFoundFound
No meta descriptionFoundFoundFound
No canonicalFoundFoundMissed
No lang attributeFoundFoundFound
http:// not redirected to https://FoundFoundFound
No faviconFoundFoundFound
None of six security headersMissedMissedMissed
robots.txt is an unrendered templateFoundMissedMissed
Score: danluu.com8/9 7/9 6/9
allbirds.comWell-built Shopify store; its 12 correct items catch false alarms 8 defects
Two-hop redirect chainFoundFoundMissed
No Referrer-PolicyMissedMissedMissed
No Permissions-PolicyMissedMissedMissed
CSP only upgrades requestsMissedMissedMissed
HSTS of about 91 daysMissedMissedMissed
No Cache-Control on the pageFoundPartly (counted as found)Missed
No JSON-LDFoundMissedPartly (counted as found)
714 KB HTML documentFoundFoundFound
Score: allbirds.com4/8 3/8 2/8
False alarms on allbirds.com011

What the test showed

No free check looked at security headers

danluu.com is missing all six headers and allbirds.com two, and none of the free versions mentioned it. In Insight those checks start with the Complete scan on the Growth plan.

Two tools read an empty alt as a missing one

SEOptimer and Seobility reported 13–14 images on allbirds.com without an alt attribute. All 41 images have one; 13 are empty, which is allowed for decoration. Insight reported the same 13 as empty alts that look informative, which is a question worth asking.

Free limits are tighter than they look

SEOptimer showed its daily free limit on our second report. Seobility allows three checks a day without an account. WooRank without an account showed a stored review of danluu.com dated 26 October 2023.

Prices on 29 September 2026

The seven tools at a glance

Monthly billing in USD, prices from 29 September 2026. “Docs only” means the tool needs an account or a trial, so we describe it from the vendor’s own pages.

The seven tools at a glance
ToolFree optionMonthly price Basis
SO SEOptimer Agencies that want an audit form that brings in leadsReport without account, about 2 a dayfrom $29 white-label $39 Tested
CometWeb Insight Teams fixing SEO, performance and accessibility from one listFree plan: 1 Standard audit/mofrom $39 white-label $156 Tested (ours)
SG SiteGuru Site owners who prefer a weekly to-do list to a score6-week trialfrom $49 white-label included Docs only
SB Seobility Small sites that need a free plan with a real crawl3 checks a day; Basic planfrom $69.90 white-label $109.90 Tested
WR WooRank The tool you are replacing, for referenceStored review preview; 3-day trial for $1from $89.99 white-label $199.99 reference
SC Sitechecker Teams watching many client sites14 days of full accessfrom $99 white-label $449 Docs only
SR SE Ranking Agencies that also track rankings and keywordsLimited checker; 14-day trialfrom $129 white-label $198 Docs only
IN Insites Agency sales teams that audit prospects in volumeDemo onlynot publishedwhite-label includedDocs only

Insites does not publish prices. SE Ranking: Core plus the Agency Pack add-on, which is billed annually only. WooRank: white-label on Premium, 3-day trial with a $1 card hold.

Tool by tool

What we know about each tool

We ran three of them ourselves. The other four need an account or a trial, so we describe them from the vendor’s own pages.

Tested on both sites3

CometWeb Insight

Tested (ours)

Teams fixing SEO, performance and accessibility from one list

from $39white-label $156

What we found

8 of 9 on danluu.com and 4 of 8 on allbirds.com with no false alarm, using the Standard scan from the free plan. It was the only tool to name the full allbirds.com redirect path, http → https → www. Security headers are outside the free scan, and it added some noise of its own, such as a PWA suggestion for a blog.

Pricing

Free plan with Quick scans and one Standard audit a month. Growth $39 a month, Studio $69, Scale $156; annual billing costs ten months. Security checks and the OWASP ZAP scan start on Growth; white-label reports on Scale.

Choose it over WooRank if: One backlog should cover SEO, performance and accessibility, and you want to rerun the same checks after a fix.

SO

SEOptimer

Tested

Agencies that want an audit form that brings in leads

from $29white-label $39

What we found

A full one-page report without an account, graded C+ on danluu.com. It caught 7 of 9 defects there, including the HTTP redirect and the favicon, and on allbirds.com it spotted the redirect chain through PageSpeed Insights. It missed every security header and read the broken robots.txt as fine. Six of its 20 danluu.com recommendations were about social profiles, a Facebook pixel and local business schema, which do not apply to a blog.

Pricing

DIY $29 a month, White Label $39, Lead Generation $59, exactly 25% less on annual billing; 14-day trial. The embeddable audit form is on the $59 plan only.

Choose it over WooRank if: You mainly need branded one-page reports and a lead form on your site, for less than WooRank Premium.

SB

Seobility

Tested

Small sites that need a free plan with a real crawl

from $69.90white-label $109.90

What we found

6 of 9 on danluu.com, with a to-do list sorted by priority, plus a missing doctype we had not listed. It rated the canonical check as passed on a page that has none. On allbirds.com it flagged only the heavy HTML, noted without flagging it that the page has no structured data, and called the redirects fine even when we started from http://allbirds.com.

Pricing

A free Basic plan with 1 project and 100 pages per crawl. Premium $69.90 a month, Professional $109.90, Agency $239.90 (shown as €59.90, €99.90 and €209.90 by default, excluding VAT).

Note

The pricing table puts white-label on Professional, while the checker page says Premium can export branded PDFs; the vendor’s own pages disagree.

Choose it over WooRank if: You look after a few small sites and want a free plan that crawls more than one page.

Described from vendor pages4

SR

SE Ranking

Docs only

Agencies that also track rankings and keywords

from $129white-label $198

Why it was not tested

The full website audit needs the 14-day trial. A free SEO Checker with a daily counter exists.

Pricing

Core $129 a month, Growth $279; trial without a card. White-label reports and a lead generator come with the Agency Pack, $69 a month and billed annually only.

Choose it over WooRank if: You want site audits, rank tracking and keyword research in one subscription.

SC

Sitechecker

Docs only

Teams watching many client sites

from $99white-label $449

Why it was not tested

Two tries at its free checker returned no report without an account.

Pricing

Basic $99 a month, Standard $249, Premium $449; 14 days of full access and a 48-hour refund window. White-label from Premium.

Choose it over WooRank if: You monitor dozens of sites and want an alert when one breaks.

SG

SiteGuru

Docs only

Site owners who prefer a weekly to-do list to a score

from $49white-label $49

Why it was not tested

It needs a trial.

Pricing

Small $49 a month, Medium $99, Large $199, 20% less on annual billing; a 6-week trial without a card. White-label on every plan, up to 5,000 pages per site.

Choose it over WooRank if: You want the cheapest white-label report and a short task list.

IN

Insites

Docs only

Agency sales teams that audit prospects in volume

from not publishedwhite-label included

Why it was not tested

There is no free plan or trial, only a demo and a free AI-visibility audit.

Pricing

Not published; annual contracts priced by usage. White-label and unlimited lead widgets are included.

Choose it over WooRank if: Your sales team audits prospects every week and you buy on annual contracts anyway.

Match the tool to the job

Which alternative fits your job

Seven common situations and the tool that fits each one best, based on the test and the vendors’ own plans.

  • You want leads from your agency site
    SOSEOptimerINInsites SEOptimer’s Lead Generation plan, or Insites on an annual contract
  • You need a free plan that crawls
    SBSeobilityCometWeb Insight Seobility (100 pages) or Insight (20 pages, one Standard audit a month)
  • You also track rankings
    SRSE Ranking SE Ranking
  • You watch many client sites
    SCSitechecker Sitechecker
  • You want the cheapest white-label report
    SGSiteGuruSOSEOptimer SiteGuru or SEOptimer
  • Performance and accessibility belong in the same backlog as SEO
  • Your team already runs WooRank Projects and white-label on Premium
    WRWooRank Stay with WooRank

We tested SEOptimer and Seobility without accounts on 29 September 2026, on two sites with defects recorded beforehand. I ran Insight from my own account at the Standard level; the table shows reruns from 1 October, after fixes made during the test. The full methodology keeps the earlier results and false alarms. Prices come from vendor pricing pages checked on 29 September. See the raw results and sources

The practical differences

Where they really differ

Three differences worth considering before you change tools.

Audit scope

Insight

More areas and a shared backlog, so more signals to manage.

WooRank

Reviews gives a quick result, while Site Crawl checks technical SEO across many pages.

Work after the report

Insight

Tasks and run history live in the product.

WooRank

WooRank suggests SEO actions and lets you track a score; its team workflow has a different scope.

Technical SEO depth

Insight

Insight crawl supports diagnosis, but does not replace a dedicated SEO crawler.

WooRank

Site Crawl checks many pages and prioritizes issues. Scope and scheduling depend on the plan.

Capabilities side by side

Capability scope

This compares typical uses, not every plan, setting or add-on.

Showing 9 of 9 areas

Capability comparison: CometWeb Insight and WooRank
Area CometWeb Insight WooRank
Light SEO checklistPartialStrong
Quick client-facing reportPartialStrong
Multi-area technical auditStrongBasic
Shared priority backlogStrongPartial
Run historyStrongStrong
Before-and-after verificationStrongPartial
Deep technical SEO crawlBasicStrong
Automated accessibility checksStrongPartial
Public security signalsStrongPartial

These labels describe capability scope, not an overall product rating. Availability depends on the plan and configuration.

Check the basis of this comparison

Scope and sources

Public material behind this comparison.

Reviewed: September 2026

How we prepare comparisons

Products compared

Insight
CometWeb Insight: public product page and pricing checked in September 2026; features vary by plan
WooRank
WooRank Reviews, Projects and Site Crawl: public docs checked in September 2026

Describes typical scope from official docs and public product pages. It is not a partnership, scored ranking, or affiliate piece. We do not use third-party reviews or affiliate content as a primary source.

Product names identify the tools being compared. Trademarks belong to their owners. CometWeb is not affiliated with WooRank.

See what is happening on your site.

Insight connects an audit to priorities, tasks and a retest after changes.

No credit card Report with date and sources Free account in the app